Rightshold Sign up

Research · 9 October 2026

The agentic internet

A demand-driven scenario model of who makes the internet's requests, 2026–2036

Our planning model asks one question: as people hand everyday work to AI task agents, what share of requests to public websites and APIs will come from those agents, from other automation and from people themselves? Below are the results, every assumption behind them, and the evidence we used.

Conditional forecastScenario forecasts, not measurementsResearch date 2026-10-09

Headline findings

Who makes the internet's requestsShare of requests to public websites and APIs · planning case · conditional forecast
  • AI task agents
  • Other automation
  • Human requests
AI task agents' share of requests to public websites and APIs rises from an assumed 1% in 2026 to 95.7% in 2036 in our planning caseStacked area chart, planning case, conditional forecast. AI task agents: 1% in 2026 (assumed), 63.8% in 2029, 80.7% in 2030, 95.7% in 2036. Other automation falls from 52% to 3.4% and human requests from 47% to 0.85%. The data table that follows lists every year. 0%25%50%75%100%20262027202820292030203120322033203420352036assumed Human requests47% → 0.9% of requestsOther automation52% → 3.4% of requestsAI task agentsacting for people · 1% → 95.7%202963.8%203080.7%203695.7% AI task agents' share of requests to public websites and APIs rises from an assumed 1% in 2026 to 95.7% in 2036 in our planning caseStacked area chart, planning case, conditional forecast. AI task agents: 1% in 2026 (assumed), 63.8% in 2029, 80.7% in 2030, 95.7% in 2036. Other automation falls from 52% to 3.4% and human requests from 47% to 0.85%. The data table that follows lists every year. 0%50%100%202620282030203220342036assumed HumanrequestsOtherAI task agents1% → 95.7%202963.8%203080.7%203695.7%
Planning case: share of public-facing requests by origin, 2026–2036 (2026 is an assumed normalization)
YearAI task agentsOther automationHuman requestsAll automatedStatus
20261.00%52.00%47.00%53.00%assumed normalization
20278.89%49.19%41.92%58.08%conditional forecast
202834.67%36.86%28.47%71.53%conditional forecast
202963.84%21.70%14.46%85.54%conditional forecast
203080.66%12.44%6.90%93.10%conditional forecast
203187.82%8.33%3.84%96.16%conditional forecast
203291.37%6.21%2.42%97.58%conditional forecast
203393.30%5.00%1.70%98.30%conditional forecast
203494.50%4.22%1.28%98.72%conditional forecast
203595.21%3.77%1.02%98.98%conditional forecast
203695.72%3.43%0.85%99.15%conditional forecast
  • 2029

    64%

    of requests come from AI task agents, while only 25% of internet users regularly use one.

  • 2030

    81%

    of requests come from agents acting for people: roughly four in five.

  • 2036

    96%

    of requests come from AI task agents, and 99% of all requests are automated.

  • 2026 → 2036

    ×26

    total requests, while direct human activity is still about half its 2026 level (47%).

  • AI task agents pass half of all public-facing requests between 2028 and 2029 in the planning case (34.7% in 2028, 63.8% in 2029), while regular adopters are 12% and 25% of internet users.
  • Direct human activity keeps falling in absolute terms, not only in share: down 13% by 2029 and 47% of its 2026 level by 2036, inside a total that grows about 26.1-fold.
  • Human requests fall below 1% of the total by 2036 (0.85%); all automation, agents plus other bots and crawlers, reaches 99.15%.
  • The result leans hardest on the assumed 2026 starting share and on how efficient agent traffic becomes; both are shown under sensitivity.

What these numbers are, and are not

  • They are conditional scenario forecasts: what follows if our assumptions hold. They are not measured traffic, a calibrated probability distribution, an industry census or a consensus forecast.
  • Annual rows are reference snapshots, not full-year traffic averages. Treat scenario dates as planning thresholds, not calibrated predictions.
  • The 2026 starting split (47% human, 1% AI task agents, 52% other automation) is an assumed normalization. No source-backed worldwide measurement establishes it.
  • More requests do not imply more people, more spending, greater social value, or equal growth in electricity use. Decimal places are not confidence.

Annual results, planning case

The planning case is mildly bullish: slightly above our own central judgment, not a statistically established percentile. Both it and the central case assume agents become reliable mass-market tools.

Planning case outputs. Shares are % of public-facing requests; volumes are indexed to a 2026 total of 100.

YearStatusHuman %Other automation %AI task agents %All automated %Total requests (2026 = 100)Human volume (2026 = 47)Agent volume (2026 = 1)Agent volume, year on year
2026Assumed47.0052.001.0053.00100.047.001.00—
2027Forecast41.9249.198.8958.08111.646.789.92+892%
2028Forecast28.4736.8634.6771.53157.244.7754.52+450%
2029Forecast14.4621.7063.8485.54282.040.77180.02+230%
2030Forecast6.9012.4480.6693.10519.235.83418.77+133%
2031Forecast3.848.3387.8296.16818.331.45718.66+72%
2032Forecast2.426.2191.3797.581,159.328.091,059.23+47%
2033Forecast1.705.0093.3098.301,519.725.801,417.90+34%
2034Forecast1.284.2294.5098.721,900.924.241,796.42+27%
2035Forecast1.023.7795.2198.982,246.723.032,139.00+19%
2036Forecast0.853.4395.7299.152,610.522.192,498.94+17%

Assumptions by year

Planning case assumptions. Every forward input is our judgment, not an estimate fitted to data; indices are relative to 2026 = 1.

YearRegular agent users, % of internet users (p)Jobs per adopter (J)Worker fan-out (F)External requests per worker (E)Business / consumer requests (b)Net workload per adopter (K)
20260.81.001.001.000.201.000
20274.01.401.400.930.281.944
202812.02.001.800.850.373.494
202925.02.602.200.780.465.428
203040.03.202.600.720.557.738
203153.03.702.900.670.649.825
203263.04.203.200.620.7211.944
203370.04.703.450.580.8014.107
203475.05.203.650.550.8816.354
203579.05.603.850.520.9418.125
203682.06.004.000.501.0020.000

Scenarios

Each scenario changes how fast people adopt agents and how much work each adopter delegates, and holds everything else. They are alternative assumptions, not confidence intervals, and carry no assigned probabilities. Our central judgment is our own subjective reference, not an industry consensus.

  • Constrained29.3% in 203075.4%
  • Central71.1% in 203093.8%
  • Planning case80.7% in 203095.7%
  • Hyper-adoption99% by 203399.6%

AI task agents' share of public-facing requests by scenario.

Scenario20302036First year at 99% AI task agents
Constrained adoption29.3%75.4%Not by 2036
Central judgment71.1%93.8%Not by 2036
Planning case (slightly above central)80.7%95.7%Not by 2036
Hyper-adoption, heavier workloads96.8%99.6%2033
Every scenario, year by year

Regular agent users (% of internet users), net workload per adopter (2026 = 1), AI task-agent share and all-automated share (% of requests).

YearConstrainedCentralPlanning caseHyper-adoption
Users %Work ×Agents %Automated %Users %Work ×Agents %Automated %Users %Work ×Agents %Automated %Users %Work ×Agents %Automated %
20260.81.001.0053.000.81.001.0053.000.81.001.0053.000.81.001.0053.00
20272.01.202.9054.953.01.705.9956.574.01.948.8958.087.03.0021.0264.12
20285.01.508.4858.859.02.8023.9966.4212.03.4934.6771.5325.08.0072.6588.84
202910.01.8018.1664.7020.04.0050.5479.6925.05.4363.8485.5450.016.091.9897.28
203016.02.1029.3170.9634.05.5071.1289.2840.07.7480.6693.1070.028.096.7699.11
203123.02.5041.6077.3547.07.0081.6693.9253.09.8387.8296.1680.045.098.2499.59
203230.02.9051.9582.4957.08.5086.9496.1163.011.991.3797.5886.065.098.8699.76
203337.03.3060.3486.4965.010.089.9997.3270.014.193.3098.3090.090.099.2099.85
203444.03.7067.0289.5771.011.591.8598.0175.016.494.5098.7292.0120.099.4099.89
203550.04.1071.8491.7175.013.093.0198.4279.018.195.2198.9893.0150.099.5199.92
203655.04.5075.3693.2378.014.593.8398.7082.020.095.7299.1594.0180.099.5999.93

Hyper-adoption reaches 99% AI task-agent traffic in 2033. The central and planning paths do not reach 99% task agents by 2036.

Sensitivity

The assumed 2026 task-agent share is an especially weak anchor: no global, deduplicated series yet measures regular autonomous-agent users, external workload per user or the task-agent request share. Much more efficient APIs could also cut request shares sharply with unchanged adoption and delegation, which is why 99% agent traffic is not a necessary condition for an agent-first economy.

2036 shares when one assumption changes and every other input of the planning case is held.

AssumptionAI task agents, 2036All automated, 2036
Planning case as published95.72%99.15%
Starting task-agent share 0.25% instead of 1%84.7%97.0%
Requests per worker fall 95% instead of 50%69.1%93.9%

Where the 2036 workload comes from

Net workload per adopter (K) multiplies four judgments, each relative to 2026. It counts expected executed work, not every possible child in an unrestricted tree of agents, and business requests are additional calls, never a second count of one exchange.

6×Jobs per adoptermore delegated work, including proactive checks
4×Worker fan-outmean executed workers per job
0.5×Requests per workerfewer external calls as APIs get more efficient
1.67×Business agentsindependent business-agent calls, (1 + 1) / (1 + 0.2)
20×Net workload per adopterexternal requests per regular user, vs 2026

Method

Scope

We count public-facing application requests to websites and internet-facing APIs once per request. Network packets, bulk and video byte measurements, model reasoning and internal sub-agent messages that never cross that boundary are excluded. AI task-agent traffic is a mechanism category, whatever the intent behind it, good or bad; other automation covers conventional bots and AI crawlers. The model is not a measure of economic value, purchases, jobs, human attention or bandwidth.

Starting point

Thales reports 47% human and 53% automated traffic for its 2025 sample (S01). We use that split only as normalization context, and we assume the automated 53 points divide into 1 point of AI task-agent traffic and 52 points of other automation. We also assume regular agent users start at 0.8% of internet users. Neither figure is measured.

Equations

With t years after 2026, p the share of internet users who regularly use agents, J jobs per adopter, F mean executed worker fan-out, E external requests per worker (all relative to 2026) and b independent business-agent requests per consumer-agent request:

K = J × F × E × (1 + b) / (1 + b₂₀₂₆)
N = 1.02^t
A = A₂₀₂₆ × N × (p / p₂₀₂₆) × K
H = H₂₀₂₆ × N × (1 − 0.75p) / (1 − 0.75p₂₀₂₆)
O = O₂₀₂₆ × N × 1.035^t
Total = A + H + O; each share = category / Total; all automated = (A + O) / Total

Human-origin activity falls by up to 75% at full adoption, so not all human activity disappears. Internet use grows 2% a year, which changes volumes but not shares, and other automation grows 3.5% a year faster than users. No unlimited replication or all-to-all communication between agents is assumed.

The 2036 endpoint

In 2036, p = 0.82, J = 6, F = 4, E = 0.5 and b = 1, so K = 6 × 4 × 0.5 × (2 / 1.2) = 20. That gives 95.72% AI task agents, 3.43% other automation and 0.85% human requests: 99.15% automated, in a total of 2,610.5 against 100 in 2026. Direct human activity is 47% of its own 2026 level, despite being under 1% of the larger total.

Checks

We checked that categories sum to 100%, that parameters stay within bounds, recomputed the 2036 endpoint independently with decimal arithmetic, compared the workbook's formulas with an independent recomputation, and scanned the workbook for formula errors. The model is designed for monthly revision; inspect the sensitivity rather than reading decimal places as confidence.

Evidence ledger

Sources establish current capabilities, sampled activity and constraints; none validates the model's exact annual adoption rates or its 99% threshold date.

IDSourceEvidence typePeriodFinding and limitation
S01Thales, 2026 Bad Bot ReportObserved, vendor sample2025 traffic47% human; 53% automated. Used only as a historical normalization reference, not a 2026 global census.
S02HUMAN, Muse early observationsObserved, vendor sample2026-09-28Muse averaged 72% of daily identified AI-agent requests in the early window; not 72% of total internet traffic.
S03Forbes reporting Sensor TowerReported third-party estimate2026-09-30Muse estimated 5 million U.S. downloads in 22 days. Downloads are not active users.
S04TNW reporting The InformationReported internal usage2026-10-02Over 3 million weekly prompting users and over 1 million daily prompting users; not independently audited.
S05DataDome Q2 AI Traffic ReportObserved, mixed AI categoryQ2 202617.7 billion AI requests, up 45% quarter on quarter. Category includes AI crawlers/indexers; not all autonomous task execution.
S06Meta, Introducing MuseProduct announcement2026-09-08; updated 2026-09-30Persistent secure computer, browser, and WhatsApp access; user controls permissions. Distribution is not equivalent to adoption.
S07OpenAI, Introducing dotsProduct announcement2026-09-29Proactive assistants included with eligible Pro/Business Premium plans; work allowances apply.
S08xAI, Grok BotProduct documentationAccessed 2026-10-09Persistent cloud-computer agents and parallel work; no deduplicated global adoption statistic used.
S09OpenClaw, Sub-agentsTechnical documentationAccessed 2026-10-09Supports child agents and controlled concurrency/depth. Spawning is not unlimited replication.
S10Nous Research, Hermes delegationTechnical documentationAccessed 2026-10-09Child agents have isolated contexts; inherited tool permissions. Counts are not unique people.
S11Anthropic, Multi-agent research systemProvider engineering measurements2025-06-13Reported approximately 4x agent and 15x multi-agent token use versus chats. Tokens are not HTTP requests.
S12METR, Time horizonsBenchmark researchUpdated 2026-09-08Measures software-task completion at stated reliability levels; not a measure of whole-job replacement.
S13Google, Agent2AgentTechnical standard announcement2025-04-09Inter-agent communication standard. Existence does not prove universal adoption.
S14Google Cloud, AP2Technical standard announcement2025-09-16Verifiable intent/cart mandates support bounded payment authority and evidence.
S15Cloudflare, Pay Per UseProduct announcement2026; accessed 2026-10-09Content compensation based on use rather than merely crawling; adoption not assumed universal.
S16Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Canaries updateEconomic research2026-08-12; employment through June 202619% kept-pace employment shortfall for young workers in highly exposed occupations; no economy-wide displacement finding. Not a causal AI-only estimate.
S17ILO / NASKOccupational exposure research2025-05-20Approximately one quarter of jobs show some GenAI exposure; exposure is not job loss.
S18IEA, Key Questions on Energy and AIExternal energy projection2026Data-centre electricity demand projected from 485 TWh in 2025 to around 950 TWh in 2030; not an agent-specific energy forecast.
S19Stanford AI IndexResearch synthesis2025 report; historical 2022–2024 costsFixed GPT-3.5-level benchmark inference costs fell more than 280-fold. Not a universal ongoing cost decline.
S20Anthropic, Multiagent systemsSafety / coordination research2026-09Experiments document both collaboration benefits and coordination/collusion failure modes.

Data and reuse

The workbook keeps every assumption editable and every output formula-driven. The CSV holds the annual planning case at full precision; the JSON endpoint serves everything on this page for agents.

Cite as: Rightshold, “The agentic internet: a demand-driven scenario model, 2026–2036”, research date 2026-10-09, https://www.rightshold.com/research/agentic-internet.

When software acts for people, the scarce thing is trusted authority: who an agent acts for, what it may use and spend, receipts, dispute resolution and a record that stays with it. Rightshold provides each of these, at levels it states and you can check.