Rightshold Sign up

MIT vs GPL 3.0: what is the difference?

Short answer: MIT: commercial use, modification, redistribution: Yes. GPL 3.0: the same uses: Yes.

MIT: Deal in the software without restriction, including to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense and sell it, as long as the copyright and permission notice go with all copies or substantial portions. GPL 3.0: Run, study, change and share the software, including commercially. If you convey it or a work based on it, you must do so under the GPL with the corresponding source.

MIT: commercial use, modification, redistribution: Yes

License: MIT License (MIT, curated)

Duties: attribution, license_notice

GPL 3.0: the same uses: Yes

License: GNU General Public License v3.0 (GPL-3.0-only, curated)

Duties: attribution, license_notice, state_changes, share_alike, source_disclosure

Duties and notes compared

Combined in one work: compatible.

Context

Sources

Check it yourself (free, no key)

{
  "tool": "check_license",
  "arguments": {
    "license": "MIT",
    "intended_use": {
      "commercial_use": true,
      "modification": true,
      "redistribution": true
    }
  }
}

Computed from Rightshold's license profiles; not legal advice. Updated 2026-10-19. JSON · Markdown