Rightshold Sign up

Apache 2.0 vs GPL 3.0: what is the difference?

Short answer: Apache 2.0: commercial use, modification, redistribution: Yes. GPL 3.0: the same uses: Yes.

Apache 2.0: Use, reproduce, modify, sublicense and distribute for any purpose, with an express patent license; keep notices, include the license and mark changed files. GPL 3.0: Run, study, change and share the software, including commercially. If you convey it or a work based on it, you must do so under the GPL with the corresponding source.

Apache 2.0: commercial use, modification, redistribution: Yes

License: Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0, curated)

Duties: attribution, license_notice, state_changes

GPL 3.0: the same uses: Yes

License: GNU General Public License v3.0 (GPL-3.0-only, curated)

Duties: attribution, license_notice, state_changes, share_alike, source_disclosure

Duties and notes compared

Combined in one work: compatible.

Context

Sources

Check it yourself (free, no key)

{
  "tool": "check_license",
  "arguments": {
    "license": "Apache-2.0",
    "intended_use": {
      "commercial_use": true,
      "modification": true,
      "redistribution": true
    }
  }
}

Computed from Rightshold's license profiles; not legal advice. Updated 2026-10-19. JSON · Markdown