Apache 2.0 vs BSD 3-Clause: what is the difference?
Short answer: Apache 2.0: commercial use, modification, redistribution: Yes. BSD 3-Clause: the same uses: Yes.
Apache 2.0: Use, reproduce, modify, sublicense and distribute for any purpose, with an express patent license; keep notices, include the license and mark changed files. BSD 3-Clause: Redistribute and use with or without modification, keeping the notice, conditions and disclaimer; contributors' names may not be used to endorse your product.
Apache 2.0: commercial use, modification, redistribution: Yes
License: Apache License 2.0 (Apache-2.0, curated)
- Every use you described is granted by Apache 2.0, and nothing you described is prohibited.
Duties: attribution, license_notice, state_changes
BSD 3-Clause: the same uses: Yes
License: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (BSD-3-Clause, curated)
- Every use you described is granted by BSD 3-Clause, and nothing you described is prohibited.
Duties: attribution, license_notice, no_endorsement
Duties and notes compared
- Apache-2.0: duties attribution, license_notice, state_changes. Includes an express patent license that ends for anyone who sues over patents in the work (section 3). Does not grant rights to the licensor's trademarks (section 6).
- BSD-3-Clause: duties attribution, license_notice, no_endorsement. Sublicensing is not mentioned, so it is not treated as granted.
Combined in one work: compatible.
Context
- The duties differ: compare the duties and notes listed for each license below.
Sources
- Apache License 2.0: official text
- Apache-2.0 on the SPDX License List
- BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License: official text
- BSD-3-Clause on the SPDX License List
Check it yourself (free, no key)
{
"tool": "check_license",
"arguments": {
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"intended_use": {
"commercial_use": true,
"modification": true,
"redistribution": true
}
}
}Computed from Rightshold's license profiles; not legal advice. Updated 2026-10-19. JSON · Markdown
