Rightshold™ Sign up

Answers · copyright myths

Does "no copyright infringement intended" protect you?

Short answer: No. Under U.S. law copyright infringement does not depend on intent: if you copy, post or perform someone's work without permission and no exception such as fair use applies, it infringes whatever your caption says. The disclaimer does not count as a license, crediting the creator is not permission, and saying you don't own the material shows you knew it was someone else's. Intent matters only at the edges, mainly in how much a court can award. What protects you is a license, the creator's permission, public-domain material, or a use that really qualifies as fair use.

Checklist

  1. Find out who owns the material and what license, if any, it carries (a Creative Commons license, stock terms, the platform's own music library terms).
  2. If there is a license, follow it exactly: credit where it asks, no commercial use under NC, no edits under ND.
  3. If there is no license, ask the owner for written permission or use something you can license.
  4. If you are relying on fair use, weigh the four factors honestly: why you use it (commentary, criticism and parody weigh more than decoration), what kind of work it is, how much you take, and whether your use could replace the original or its licensing market. No fixed number of seconds or percentage is safe.
  5. Drop the disclaimer: "no infringement intended", "all rights to the owner" and "for entertainment purposes" don't change the analysis, and platforms' automated matching and takedown processes ignore them.
  6. Keep records of licenses and permissions, with dates, for everything you publish.

Where intent does matter

Outside the U.S.

License checks (computed)

Yes means the license grants the use, on the duties listed. Duties such as source_disclosure, share_alike and network_source_offer are the ones that conflict with keeping a product closed-source.

UseAnswerWhy
A CC BY-NC 4.0 clip in a monetized video, credited, with a disclaimer (CC-BY-NC-4.0)NoCC BY-NC 4.0 prohibits commercial_use. Duties: attribution, license_notice, state_changes, no_additional_restrictions.
A CC BY 4.0 clip in a monetized video, credited (CC-BY-4.0)YesEvery use you described is granted by CC BY 4.0, and nothing you described is prohibited. Duties: attribution, license_notice, state_changes, no_additional_restrictions.

Ask Rightshold (free, no key)

Add the MCP server https://www.rightshold.com/mcp to Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, Grok or VS Code, then ask: “Can I reuse this CC BY-NC 4.0 clip in a monetized YouTube video if I credit the creator?”

One-click setup

{
  "tool": "check_license",
  "arguments": {
    "license": "CC-BY-NC-4.0",
    "intended_use": {
      "commercial_use": true,
      "redistribution": true,
      "attribution_planned": true
    }
  }
}

Rightshold reads licenses and terms. It does not decide whether a particular use is fair use; that depends on facts only you and, if it comes to it, a court can weigh.

Sources

Related

Not legal advice. Updated 2026-10-28. JSON · Markdown · All answers

Get a free API key in one call

No card and no email needed. 100 free credits; the license and policy checks stay free without a key.

curl -s -X POST https://www.rightshold.com/v1/accounts/signup -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"accept_terms":true}'
export RIGHTSHOLD_API_KEY=rs_...   # the api_key from the reply (shown once)
curl -s https://www.rightshold.com/v1/licenses/check -H "Authorization: Bearer $RIGHTSHOLD_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"license":"MIT","intended_use":{"commercial_use":true}}'